Robert Weller
My feedback
6 results found
-
715 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Robert Weller
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Robert Weller
commented
This seems like a no-brainer. Why doesn't command-q work when the systems locks? It is certainly very irritating that it doesn't.
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Robert Weller
commented
There are several other comments that amount to a request for direct access to the camera to store (and synch) attachments and they should be consolidated when evaluating the priority to add features.
-
21 votesRobert Weller
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Robert Weller
commented
There are duplicates of this request down in the noise in numbers of votes that should be consolidated to raise the priority of this request. I agree strongly with "anonymous", who also posted a comment, that not being able to print is simply nonsensical. What possible logic supports the absence of a print function? It is just crazy.
-
5 votesRobert Weller
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Robert Weller
commented
It does seem strange in the extreme that there does not seem to be a way to print a record. If indeed this is true I find it to be completely inexplicable. By what possible logic, would any sane person omit such a thing in a program as widely used as this one. Bizarre. Very Bizarre.
-
39 votesRobert Weller
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Robert Weller
commented
It would be very nice if an attachment could be made directly from the device's camera without the need to create a pdf or jpg and then attach it in a separate operation. This would make it very handy to include a photocopy of a document related to the record entry. I am thinking specifically of integrating functionality similar to the iPhone app TurboScan, which is an exceeding useful tool for producing all kinds of documents, from restaurant receipts to legal documents.
After reading all twenty pages of these suggestions, I find myself questioning the basic validity of the voting process. Placing the items with large numbers of votes on the first pages simply encourages people to vote for them, not necessarily because they are the most worthy or important, but simply because they are the most popular. It is a chore to look through 20 pages of ideas, and easy to simply go with the flow on the first few pages. There are many good ideas over on pages past 10 that deserve attention. I don't mean to downplay the significance of this important suggestion to add (double!) record linking and other items with large numbers of votes. Clearly these are important things. I am simply not convinced that the voting process being used here is going to produce the proper priorities. Perhaps, but perhaps not.